Know your History Islamic Knowledge- 3rd March 1924- The Islamic Caliphate

To know that Khilaafat had been a great state for centuries and that it was a superpower on the world stage, the statement given by the father of modern economy is a great testimony.

Adam Smith, the 18th Century founder of modern economics whose picture is printed on the current UK £20 note, was exceedingly inspired by the Islaamic method of governing.

He proclaimed that:

“…the empire of the Caliphs seems to have been the first state under which the world enjoyed that degree of tranquility which the cultivation of the sciences requires. It was under the protection of those generous and magnificent princes, that the ancient philosophy and astronomy of the Greeks were restored and established in the East; that tranquility, which their mild, just and religious government diffused over their vast empire, revived the curiosity of mankind, to inquire into the connecting principles of nature.”

( Adam Smith, ‘History of Astronomy’, The Essays of Adam Smith (London, 1869), p. 353)

Hence it was a leading state in economy, science, technology, commerce, architecture and jurisprudence. The Khilaafat provided peace and security for its citizens, allowing them to live in harmony together as a single state. The Khilafah even provided sanctuary for those who were persecuted because of their beliefs.

With the removal of the sole legitimate leadership of the Muslims, the Caliphate, the lands of Islaam were divided in to numerous statelets and disputed territories. These new entities were established along the lines of ethnicity, sectarianism and racism by the colonialist powers of the day in an attempt to ensure that Muslim Ummah would never rise again. Nationalism that was nurtured by the colonialists in the run up to the destruction of the Caliphate helped to ensure that these new entities would remain at loggerheads, never to think of uniting again. Any attempts to replicate the power of a unitary leadership of the Muslim world were replaced by pathetic and impotent bodies such as Arab League and the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC). These organizations were designed to perpetuate disunity and division as they preserved the borders and barriers between Muslims that the colonialists had established. These states have never had the interests of Islam and the Muslims at heart.

Western colonialism put in place a motley crew of dictators, monarchs, autocrats that have served them in a manner more loyal than their own populations.

The Muslim world has indeed seen destruction, devastation and calamity for the past 90 years, despite the fact that the Muslim ummah is the richest in natural resources, manpower, army, land, technological capability, wealth and most importantly Ieemaan in Allaah Kareem

Caliph-hood & Islamic History 3rd March 1924 -The Ottomans

The 3rd of March is a date that is etched into the history of the Muslim Ummah as one of its darkest days ever. It was on this date in the fateful year of 1924 CE that the last vestige of legitimate Islaamic rule was ended. The office of Caliphate was abolished by Mustafa Kamal and the Muslim Ummah has since then been plunged in to darkness and humiliation.
This was the beginning of the humiliation that the Muslim world has suffered to this very day. The Ummah was set to be subjected to numerous tragedies that would involve against it murderous wars, foreign occupation, economic strangulation, political manipulation as well as a cultural colonialism that sought to distance the Muslim world from the concept of Islaamic ruling and the obligation of living under the Caliphate.

With the removal of the sole legitimate leadership of the Muslims, the Caliphate, the lands of Islaam were divided in to numerous statelets and disputed territories. These new entities were established along the lines of ethnicity, sectarianism and racism by the colonialist powers of the day in an attempt to ensure that Muslim Ummah would never rise again.

Today 3rd March, 90 years ago, the then British Foreign Minister Lord Curzon warned, “We must put an end to anything which brings about any Islaamic unity between the sons of the Muslims. The situation now is that Turkey is dead and will never rise again, because we have destroyed its moral strength, the Caliphate and Islaam”.

Zikre-e-Jameel(Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam)

Continued....ZIkr e Jameel by Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Shafee Okarvi [Rahmatul Laah Alaieh]

Allaah Almighty has mentioned other Prophets  with their names for example

“O’ Aadam and his wife, O’ Noah, O’ Ibraaheem, O’ Moosaa Ieesaa, O’ Dawood, O’ Zakariyah, O Yahyaa”[Alaiehimus Salaam]

But Allaahﷻ has not mentioned Prophet ﷺ with his name anywhere in Qur’aan but mentioned him with Beautiful titles like, “O’ Prophet, O’ Muzammil, O’ Muddassir, T’ahaa, Yaaseen. In the similar way previous Ummats used to call their Prophets with their names but Allaah ﷻ ordered Muslims not to call Prophet ﷺ like they used to call one another i.e. do not say, O’ Muhammad or O’ Ahmad but call him with respect as O’ Prophet of Allaah ﷻ, O’ Habeebul Laah or Rahmatul lil Aalameen ﷺ....to be continued In Shaa Allaah!

Ghazi Mumtaz Qadri Salam pesh krty hue

Mumtaz Qadiri

GHAAZI ILM UD DEEN SHAHEED FUNERAL Rare Photo] Namaz-e-Janaazah of Ghaazi Ilm-ud-deen Shaheed (4 December 1908 – 31 October 1929). Allamah Iqbal can be seen sitting in front row.

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Dear readers somewhat similar, is the case of these Deobandi, Wahaabi, and Tableeghi groups. Until they don’t finish the real reason of the controversy, unless they don’t deny being the believer and accept er of infidel and blasphemic writings, they may give millions of explanations the dispute will remain as it is.

Along with this, also see this speaking lies, false explanation, fabricating, hoodwinking people and the efforts of deceiving others are their habits. Perhaps they think that everyone else living in the world are deaf and blind.

See some examples of their lies and decide for yourselves how much lies these Deobandi, Wahaabi speak.

On page 2 of part 1 of "Johannesburg to Bareilly," it is written that, "The ‘scholars of Deoband have no association with Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi (Imaam of the Wahaabi faction).

They have no concern with his mission, neither is he their spiritual leader, nor have they met him. Instead the scholars of Deoband are Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at and they belong to the Hanafee sect."*

----------------------------------------------------------------------*Meaning it is an accepted and established fact infront of them that “Wahaabi”are those who are in some way associated with Ibne Abdul Wahaab or his follower of believer.

In this statement it has been proved for the scholars of Deoband that they are not Wahaabi and they have nothing to do with the Imaam of the Wahaabis Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi.  See its reply is present in the writings of the scholars of Deoband themselves, please see,

In the book of famous debater of Deoband, Muhammad Manzoor Nu'maani, "Shaiekh Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahaab Aur Hindustan Kay Ulamah-e-Haq (the rightly-guided scholars of India)," has been published 10 years ago.

This book has the endorsement and attestation of Shaiekh Muhammad Zakariya Kandhalvi and Qaari Muhammad Taiyyab Sahaab. Also, it has been proved in this book that there is no ideological difference etc between Shaiekh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahaab Najdi and the scholars of Deoband, and instead these Najdi Wahaabi and Deobandi are all the same.  I am not giving my reviews on the book of Nu'maani Saahib in this writing.

My aim is to only prove the lies of the authors of "Johannesburg to Bareilly" infront of my readers so that the readers may know how much affection does the author of "Johannesburg to Bareilly" have with lies. Their scholars and elders are trying to prove themselves to be Wahaabi and the author of "Johannesburg to Bareilly," while stationed in South Africa, is free from being engaged in uttering lies. Dear readers, view some other writings of the elders of the scholars of Deoband.

"This title (Wahaabi) means a person who is subservient or favorable to the creed of Ibne Abdul Wahaab." (Imdaad-ul-Fataawa, Pg 233, vol 5, printed in Thana Bhawan).

The Imaam of the Deobandis Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi says, "The followers of Muhammad Ibne Wahaab (Najdi) are called Wahaabi. Their beliefs were excellent and their creed was Hanbali.  Although they were harsh in temperament but he and his followers are good people."  (Fataawa-e-Rasheediyah, Pg 111, vol-1, Talifaat-e-Rasheediyah, Pg 242)

Dear readers, you have seen the verdict of Gangohi Saahib about Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi.  Now see the statements of the scholars of Deoband by themselves what they have written about Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi and then, decide for yourselves who is correct among them and who is a liar?

DATES AND CALULATION-MUMTAAZ QADIREE-HAZRAT ALLAAMAH KAUKAB NOORANI OKARVI

#okarvi-#mumtazqadiri

PEMRA KI TARAF SAY CHANNELS KO MILNAY WALA NOTICE

Ghazi

Namaaz-e-Janaaza of Mumtaz Qadri Shaheed

Ghazi Mumtaz Qadri Ko Phansi milny se phy k kuch waqiat

The conditions for Salaatul Janaazah

FUNERAL RITES- Namaaz e Janaazah

The  "Arkaan", Waajibaat"  of funeral prayer...

There are two "Rukn,Arkaan" (obligatory acts) in Salaatul Janaazah i. to say "Allaah-o-Akbar" four times and to offer it standing and three are Sunnat-e-Muakkadaah i.e. to glorify Allaah [Ta'aalaa], invoke  Almighty Allaah's blessings on the Holy Prophet  [Sallal Laahu Alaieh Wa Sallam] and make "Du'aa" for the dead.

The conditions for Salaatul Janaazah?

There are two kinds of conditions, requisites for holding funeral prayer -concerning Prayer,worship and

Concerning the dead body.

Requisites for "Prayers" are exactly the same as those of other prayers and as for the dead body there are certain conditions i.e. (1). The dead must be Muslim,(2). body and shroud should be clean,(3). dead body should be present.

Hence, there is no Salaatul Janaazah for an absentee dead. The funeral prayer of Najaashi (Negus) the king of Abyssinia offered by the Holy Prophet [Peace be upon him] without the bier being in front was one of his (Prophet's) exclusive privileges.

Doing so is not lawful for others,(4). the dead body should either be on the land or in hands but be near to the Imaam, (5).

Bier should be placed in front of the prayer-carpet,cloth facing the Qiblaah,(6) all those parts of the body which are necessary to be covered must be covered and (7) dead body should be in front of the Imaam.

Is funeral prayer "Farz" or "Waajib"?

FUNERAL RITES-ISLAAMIC KNOWLEDGE

Is funeral prayer "Farz" or "Waajib"?

A. "Salaatul Janaazah" (funeral prayer) is "Farz-e-Kifaayah" i.e. if it is offered by only one all will be absolved of the obligation, otherwise all those who had come to know of it and did not offer, will be sinner. The denier of the "obligatory nature" of Salaatul Janaazah is an infidel. Jamaa'at is not essential for it. Even if a single person offered it, "Farz" would be accomplished.

Mumtaz Qadri Shaheed

Salutation to the Matyred Aashiq e Rasool [Sallal Laahu Alaieh Wa Sallam] Malik Mumtaaz Qaadiree..

بسم اللہ الرحمن الرحیم - والصلوة والسلام على رسوله الكريم وعلى آله وأصحابه أجمعين.

آج پیر  (یوم ولادت رسول اکرم صلی اللہ علیہ والہ وسلم ) کی صبح ملک ممتاز حسین قادری کو ایک گستاخ رسول کو قتل کرنے پر سزائے موت دے دی گئی -وہ گستاخ رسول جس نے ایک سکھ عورت سے شادی کر رکهی تهی ،وہ سور کھاتا تھا، شراب پیتا تھا، قرآن کی توہین کرتا تھا ،اس کے علانیہ گناہوں کی فہرست طویل هے - اس  قانون کی بالادستی کے لیے اسے سزا دے دی گئی جس قانون نے هر مجرم کو نہ صرف پناہ دی هے بلکہ بڑے جرموں پر عہدے بھی بڑے دیئے ہیں - ملک ممتاز حسین قادری کے لیے قانون اور انصاف کی باتیں کرنے والے شاہ رخ جتوئی، ایان علی، ریمنڈ ڈیوس اور اس جیسے کتنے مجرموں کو جانے کیوں بھول جاتے ہیں؟ بلاشبہ ملک ممتاز حسین قادری  کے قتل کا  یہ گھناؤنا جرم پاکستان کی حکومت سے هوا ہے جو اس کے  ماتھے کا داغ بن کر اس کے لیے ملامتیں سمیٹتا رهے گا جب کہ شہید عشق رسول ملک  ممتاز حسین قادری کو هر مسلمان سلام کرتا رہے گا