Auliyaa Allah

Alaa Hazrat Imaam Ahmad Razaa Khaan Bareillvi
[Rahmatul Laahi Alaieh] the Mujaddid of his Time...the Savior of Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaa'at love...&
His Principles
1. Love of Allaah Kareem and His Beloved Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu Alaiehi Wa Sallam] is before anything & everything
He said “If my heart was ever divided into two parts, one of them would have written on it “laa ilaahaa Illal Laah” and on the other “Muhammadur Rasoolul Laah”!!
He did not tolerate blasphemy (disrespect) of the Noble Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu Alaiehi Wa Sallam] or of the pious companions or Auliyaa  Allaah and stood strongly against the corrupted groups of his time for this reason.

Mazaaraat of the Holy Saints

WHO ARE THE AHLE SUNNAT WA JAMAA'AT?

Written by:

Allaamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi

(May his grace continue)

Bismil Laahir Rahmaan Nir Raheem

Was-Salaatu Was-Salaamu 'Alaa Rasoolihil Kareem

Continued Article...Who Are Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaa'at?

Those Muslims who are by belief Maatureedi or Ash'aree and in Jurist form the followers (مقلدين  Muqallideen) of Hanafee, Shaafi’ee, Maalikee, Hanmbalee and are associated with some correct Chain of Suufi  Doctrines Qaadiree, Chishtee, Naqshbandee, Suharwardee, Shaazli, Rifaa'ee etc. are all Ahl-e-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at (In one word  سنى “Sunni”). (Those Sunni Believers with correct beliefs who are not their followers or are not associated with any Suufi Chain of Doctrine they are also included in Sawaad-e-A’zam.)  Since the beginning of every era Sawaad-e-A’zam Ahl-e-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at have been in large quantity. But the rule of evaluation is not more or less rather it is the following of the Truth.

The title or term Ahl-e-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at has not been self-created after the first three periods (قرون ثلاثه Quroon-e- Salaasah). Rather before the innovated sects this expression is being used for the true Muslims with correct beliefs since the period of the sacred physical presence of the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) and the His holy Companions.

Therefore the narration of Hazrat Saiyyidinaa Imaam Zaien-ul-Aabideen Alee Bin Husaien (Allaah be pleased with them) is present that

علامة أهل السنة كثرة الصلاة على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم)) .

“To send Durood Shareef in abundance on the Beloved Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) is the sign of being Ahl-e-Sunnat.” (Al-Targheeb: 963, Al Qaulul Badee pg52, Fazaail e A'maal pg688.)

٢٦٤١ - حَدَّثَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلَانَ قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو دَاوُدَ الحَفَرِيُّ، عَنْ سُفْيَانَ الثَّوْرِيِّ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ زِيَادٍ الأَفْرِيقِيِّ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «لَيَأْتِيَنَّ عَلَى أُمَّتِي مَا أَتَى عَلَى بني إسرائيل حَذْوَ النَّعْلِ بِالنَّعْلِ، حَتَّى إِنْ كَانَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ أَتَى أُمَّهُ عَلَانِيَةً لَكَانَ فِي أُمَّتِي مَنْ يَصْنَعُ ذَلِكَ، وَإِنَّ بني إسرائيل تَفَرَّقَتْ عَلَى ثِنْتَيْنِ وَسَبْعِينَ مِلَّةً، وَتَفْتَرِقُ أُمَّتِي عَلَى ثَلَاثٍ وَسَبْعِينَ مِلَّةً، كُلُّهُمْ فِي النَّارِ إِلَّا مِلَّةً وَاحِدَةً»، قَالُوا: وَمَنْ هِيَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ؟ قَالَ: «مَا أَنَا عَلَيْهِ وَأَصْحَابِي»:

It is narrated by Abdul Laah Bin Amar that the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) has stated “......Certainly Bani Israa'eel  (The progeny of Israa’eel) are divided in 72 groups and my Ummat (Nation) will be divided in 73 groups, beside just one group all will go to hell.” The respected Companions (Allaah be pleased with them) said, “Yaa Rasoolal Laah! (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaieka Wa Sallam), Who will be that one group?” So the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) stated “The path on which I am and are my Companions on.” (Tirmizee:2641 , Ibne Maajah: 3992, Abu Daawood: 4597, Miskaat: 171)

Imaam Mullaa Alee Qaari (Allaah have mercy on him) has said that ما انا عليه واصحابى"Maa Anaa ‘Alaiehi Wa As-haabi‘s " verification is undoubtedly, the Ahl-e-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at.  It is said the clarification of the statement is like this that the dwellers of Paradise are those who are by belief, by words and by action on the way of the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) and his Companions. Because without any difference this is well known that the matter on which the Scholars of Islaam agree is the Truth and beside this it is not true.

وعن ابن عمر قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: " إن الله لا يجمع أمتي أو قال: أمة محمد على ضلالة ويد الله على الجماعة ومن شذ شذ في النار ". . رواه الترمذي

It is stated by Ibne Umar (Allaah be pleased with them) in narrations he have said the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) has stated, “Undoubtedly Allaah Ta’aalaa will not unite the Followers of the Muhammad on falsehood and the Have of Allaah is on the Jamaa’at .”

: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: «اتبعوا السواد الأعظم فإنه من شذ شذ في النار» . رواه ابن ماجه من حديث أنس

“Follow Sawaad-e-A’zam, besides any person who detaches (by belief or by words or by action from this Jamaa’at) he is separate in fire.  The meaning and translation of this is the person who is detached from his fellow People of Paradise (Ahl-e-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at), he will be placed in the hell.” (Tirmizee: 2167, Kanzul Ul Ummaal: 1029, 1030, Mishkaat :173, 174)

Hazrat Ibne Abbaas (Allaah be pleased with him) narrated that the holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) has said,   مَنْ فَارَقَ الجَمَاعَةَ شِبْرًا فَمَاتَ، إِلَّا مَاتَ مِيتَةً جَاهِلِيَّةً»

“Whoever becomes separate from the Jamaa’at (Ahl-e-Sunnat) even for a span and then dies, he will die as a rebellious sinner.” (Bukhaari: 7054)

The scholar of the opponents of Ahl-e-Sunnat Allaamah Ibne Taimiyyah has written in the interpretation of

يوم تبيض وجوه وتسود وجوه “Yauma Tabyaddu Wujoohun-Wa Taswaddu Wujooh………” (Al Qur’aan, Ch 3, Verse:106)

"Ibne Abbaas (Allaah be pleased with him) states, “On the Day of Judgment Ahl-e-Sunnat faces will be white and their opponent’s faces will be black.”

To be continued...In Shaa Allaah.

3rd March 1924 – The Forgotten Day!

Khilaafat has to be earned, it’s not brought about by politics or activism. Muslims have lost it because of their lack of adherence to the Sunnah, and they will only regain it when they begin practicing Islaam according to the Sunnah again.

Know your History Islamic Knowledge-The Ottoman & Kemal Attaturuk

The World must know how human rights of billions of people violated by the treacherous way when 1300 years old Caliphate was abolished in 1924. We all know about the role played by Lawrence of Arabia; but many of us were ignorant about the following: "the new Turkish State(Republic of Turkey) which was established by Doenmehs (secret jews of Turkey), is a state of the people and a state by the people.
" But why did Mustafa Kemal abolish the Caliphate, which was the political System of majority people of Turkey?
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk was a Jew, secret Jew and the greatest enemy of Islaam, as he abolished the Caliphate and suppressed the Muslims in Turkey. Along with Western powers and Jews there were some secret Jews who were conspiring against the Khilafah. Mustafa Kemal was one of them.
He was not even a Turk. He was a Doenmeh (secret Jew). He achieved the objective of not the Turks but of the Doenmehs who slowly took over the Ottoman State by openly converting to and practicing Islaam but secretly practicing their old religion... He was not a Turk, let alone 'Father of the Turks'.
Conclusions

The fact that Kemal Atatürk  was a despot and dictator cannot be denied. It

was his cruelty and sadistic treatment of Muslims that makes him stand out as one of the worst enemies of God. The above was only what was reported and recorded by mostly Western observers. The extent of what actually went on in the new Turkey by the direct

policy of Kemal was heinous, to say the least. He was truly an enemy of Islaam.

Under the guise of “cleansing Islaam of political interference”, the educational system was completely overhauled.

Atatürk’s attacks on Islaam were not limited to the government, however. Everyday life for Turks was also dictated by Atatürk’s secular ideas:

Traditional Islaamic forms of headdress such as turbans and the fez were outlawed in favor of Western-style hats.

The hijaab for women was ridiculed as a “ridiculous object” and banned in public buildings.

The calendar was officially changed, from the traditional Islaamic calendar, based on the hijrah – Prophet Muhammad ﷺ’s flight to Madinah – to the Gregorian calendar, based on the birth of Jesus Christ.

In 1932, the A’zaan – the Muslim call to prayer – was outlawed in Arabic. Instead, it was rewritten using Turkish words and forced upon the country’s thousands of mosques.

Friday was no longer considered part of the weekend. Instead, Turkey was forced to follow European norms of Saturday and Sunday being days off from work.

Know your History Islamic Knowledge- 3rd March 1924- The Islamic Caliphate

To know that Khilaafat had been a great state for centuries and that it was a superpower on the world stage, the statement given by the father of modern economy is a great testimony.

Adam Smith, the 18th Century founder of modern economics whose picture is printed on the current UK £20 note, was exceedingly inspired by the Islaamic method of governing.

He proclaimed that:

“…the empire of the Caliphs seems to have been the first state under which the world enjoyed that degree of tranquility which the cultivation of the sciences requires. It was under the protection of those generous and magnificent princes, that the ancient philosophy and astronomy of the Greeks were restored and established in the East; that tranquility, which their mild, just and religious government diffused over their vast empire, revived the curiosity of mankind, to inquire into the connecting principles of nature.”

( Adam Smith, ‘History of Astronomy’, The Essays of Adam Smith (London, 1869), p. 353)

Hence it was a leading state in economy, science, technology, commerce, architecture and jurisprudence. The Khilaafat provided peace and security for its citizens, allowing them to live in harmony together as a single state. The Khilafah even provided sanctuary for those who were persecuted because of their beliefs.

With the removal of the sole legitimate leadership of the Muslims, the Caliphate, the lands of Islaam were divided in to numerous statelets and disputed territories. These new entities were established along the lines of ethnicity, sectarianism and racism by the colonialist powers of the day in an attempt to ensure that Muslim Ummah would never rise again. Nationalism that was nurtured by the colonialists in the run up to the destruction of the Caliphate helped to ensure that these new entities would remain at loggerheads, never to think of uniting again. Any attempts to replicate the power of a unitary leadership of the Muslim world were replaced by pathetic and impotent bodies such as Arab League and the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC). These organizations were designed to perpetuate disunity and division as they preserved the borders and barriers between Muslims that the colonialists had established. These states have never had the interests of Islam and the Muslims at heart.

Western colonialism put in place a motley crew of dictators, monarchs, autocrats that have served them in a manner more loyal than their own populations.

The Muslim world has indeed seen destruction, devastation and calamity for the past 90 years, despite the fact that the Muslim ummah is the richest in natural resources, manpower, army, land, technological capability, wealth and most importantly Ieemaan in Allaah Kareem

Caliph-hood & Islamic History 3rd March 1924 -The Ottomans

The 3rd of March is a date that is etched into the history of the Muslim Ummah as one of its darkest days ever. It was on this date in the fateful year of 1924 CE that the last vestige of legitimate Islaamic rule was ended. The office of Caliphate was abolished by Mustafa Kamal and the Muslim Ummah has since then been plunged in to darkness and humiliation.
This was the beginning of the humiliation that the Muslim world has suffered to this very day. The Ummah was set to be subjected to numerous tragedies that would involve against it murderous wars, foreign occupation, economic strangulation, political manipulation as well as a cultural colonialism that sought to distance the Muslim world from the concept of Islaamic ruling and the obligation of living under the Caliphate.

With the removal of the sole legitimate leadership of the Muslims, the Caliphate, the lands of Islaam were divided in to numerous statelets and disputed territories. These new entities were established along the lines of ethnicity, sectarianism and racism by the colonialist powers of the day in an attempt to ensure that Muslim Ummah would never rise again.

Today 3rd March, 90 years ago, the then British Foreign Minister Lord Curzon warned, “We must put an end to anything which brings about any Islaamic unity between the sons of the Muslims. The situation now is that Turkey is dead and will never rise again, because we have destroyed its moral strength, the Caliphate and Islaam”.

Zikre-e-Jameel(Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam)

Continued....ZIkr e Jameel by Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Shafee Okarvi [Rahmatul Laah Alaieh]

Allaah Almighty has mentioned other Prophets  with their names for example

“O’ Aadam and his wife, O’ Noah, O’ Ibraaheem, O’ Moosaa Ieesaa, O’ Dawood, O’ Zakariyah, O Yahyaa”[Alaiehimus Salaam]

But Allaahﷻ has not mentioned Prophet ﷺ with his name anywhere in Qur’aan but mentioned him with Beautiful titles like, “O’ Prophet, O’ Muzammil, O’ Muddassir, T’ahaa, Yaaseen. In the similar way previous Ummats used to call their Prophets with their names but Allaah ﷻ ordered Muslims not to call Prophet ﷺ like they used to call one another i.e. do not say, O’ Muhammad or O’ Ahmad but call him with respect as O’ Prophet of Allaah ﷻ, O’ Habeebul Laah or Rahmatul lil Aalameen ﷺ....to be continued In Shaa Allaah!

Ghazi Mumtaz Qadri Salam pesh krty hue

Mumtaz Qadiri

GHAAZI ILM UD DEEN SHAHEED FUNERAL Rare Photo] Namaz-e-Janaazah of Ghaazi Ilm-ud-deen Shaheed (4 December 1908 – 31 October 1929). Allamah Iqbal can be seen sitting in front row.

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Dear readers somewhat similar, is the case of these Deobandi, Wahaabi, and Tableeghi groups. Until they don’t finish the real reason of the controversy, unless they don’t deny being the believer and accept er of infidel and blasphemic writings, they may give millions of explanations the dispute will remain as it is.

Along with this, also see this speaking lies, false explanation, fabricating, hoodwinking people and the efforts of deceiving others are their habits. Perhaps they think that everyone else living in the world are deaf and blind.

See some examples of their lies and decide for yourselves how much lies these Deobandi, Wahaabi speak.

On page 2 of part 1 of "Johannesburg to Bareilly," it is written that, "The ‘scholars of Deoband have no association with Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi (Imaam of the Wahaabi faction).

They have no concern with his mission, neither is he their spiritual leader, nor have they met him. Instead the scholars of Deoband are Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at and they belong to the Hanafee sect."*

----------------------------------------------------------------------*Meaning it is an accepted and established fact infront of them that “Wahaabi”are those who are in some way associated with Ibne Abdul Wahaab or his follower of believer.

In this statement it has been proved for the scholars of Deoband that they are not Wahaabi and they have nothing to do with the Imaam of the Wahaabis Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi.  See its reply is present in the writings of the scholars of Deoband themselves, please see,

In the book of famous debater of Deoband, Muhammad Manzoor Nu'maani, "Shaiekh Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahaab Aur Hindustan Kay Ulamah-e-Haq (the rightly-guided scholars of India)," has been published 10 years ago.

This book has the endorsement and attestation of Shaiekh Muhammad Zakariya Kandhalvi and Qaari Muhammad Taiyyab Sahaab. Also, it has been proved in this book that there is no ideological difference etc between Shaiekh Muhammad bin Abdul Wahaab Najdi and the scholars of Deoband, and instead these Najdi Wahaabi and Deobandi are all the same.  I am not giving my reviews on the book of Nu'maani Saahib in this writing.

My aim is to only prove the lies of the authors of "Johannesburg to Bareilly" infront of my readers so that the readers may know how much affection does the author of "Johannesburg to Bareilly" have with lies. Their scholars and elders are trying to prove themselves to be Wahaabi and the author of "Johannesburg to Bareilly," while stationed in South Africa, is free from being engaged in uttering lies. Dear readers, view some other writings of the elders of the scholars of Deoband.

"This title (Wahaabi) means a person who is subservient or favorable to the creed of Ibne Abdul Wahaab." (Imdaad-ul-Fataawa, Pg 233, vol 5, printed in Thana Bhawan).

The Imaam of the Deobandis Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi says, "The followers of Muhammad Ibne Wahaab (Najdi) are called Wahaabi. Their beliefs were excellent and their creed was Hanbali.  Although they were harsh in temperament but he and his followers are good people."  (Fataawa-e-Rasheediyah, Pg 111, vol-1, Talifaat-e-Rasheediyah, Pg 242)

Dear readers, you have seen the verdict of Gangohi Saahib about Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi.  Now see the statements of the scholars of Deoband by themselves what they have written about Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi and then, decide for yourselves who is correct among them and who is a liar?

DATES AND CALULATION-MUMTAAZ QADIREE-HAZRAT ALLAAMAH KAUKAB NOORANI OKARVI

#okarvi-#mumtazqadiri

PEMRA KI TARAF SAY CHANNELS KO MILNAY WALA NOTICE

Ghazi

Namaaz-e-Janaaza of Mumtaz Qadri Shaheed

Ghazi Mumtaz Qadri Ko Phansi milny se phy k kuch waqiat