Hadees Shareef Visiting a sick

Even sickness for a Muslim is a blessing of Allaah [Ta’aalaa]. The reason for this is that if a pious person falls ill, then his status is elevated and if a sinner falls ill then his sins are forgiven.

To visit a sick person is known as "Ieeyaadat." This is to show human kindness and it is a means of earning Sawaab. Most of all it is the Sunnah of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu Alaieh Wa Sallam]

When a person visits a fellow Muslim who is ill, then he gains the Mercy of Almighty Allaah and the gift of Jannat.

The Prophet [Sallal Laahu Alaieh Wa Sallam] has stated:

"If a Muslim visits his fellow Muslim brother who is ill in the morning, then 70 000 Angels pray for that person until the night and if he visits at night then they pray for him till the morning, and due to his Ieeyaadat, he gains a garden in Paradise."

Defining Standard of Love-excerpt ZIKR E JAMEEL

By Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Shafee Okarvi

In this regard few people are of the view that standard of love is following and obeying the beloved because lover follows and accepts all orders of the beloved. As this has been said in the Arabic, that lover is under the control of beloved. Allaah ﷻ says in Qur’aan Surah Al-Imran verse 31, “Say (O Prophet ﷺ): “If you really love Allaah, then follow me, and Allaah shall love you and forgive you your sins. Allaah is Most-Forgiving, Very Merciful.””

This verse shows us that the condition or basis of love is following the beloved. So the sect that truly follows and obeys the Sunnah and Shariah of Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ is the true lover and Momin.

Now the question is what is meant by following and obedience that has been declared as the standard of the love? Does the obedience and following Sunnah means doing whatever Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ does or there is some condition as well?

If only copying what Prophet ﷺ does is the obedience that has been demanded in Shariah as well that those hypocrites and enemies of religion would also be termed as beloved of Allaah ﷻ and followers of Prophet ﷺ  who despite of being hypocrites used to offer prayers and fast as well. Not only this, in the books of Ahadees a Hadees has been narrated that near the Day of Judgment a wicked and illiterate nation would appear who will recite the Qur’aan but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.

True Muslims would consider their prayers inferior to their; their tongues would be sweeter than sugar but their hearts would be like that of wolves, their trousers would be above ankles and heads would be shaved etc.

In such a situation how merely following Sunnah and obedience can be termed as standard of love and evidence / authority of faith? In such a situation merely copying Prophet ﷺ cannot be termed as obedience and following of Sunnah as evidence of Love of Prophet ﷺ. So we need to revisit the meanings of following and obedience in order to define the true standard of love.

In the Qur’aan Allaah has told us that obedience of Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ results in being loved by Allaah ﷻ. The enemy of the beloved can never be beloved than how enemy of Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ can be beloved of Allaah ﷻ? Thus it is clarified that this verse means that one should follow the Sunnah of Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ as a demand of the love of Prophet ﷺ, if one converts his life according to the Sunnah for loving Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ than one will be loved by Allaah ﷺ. Such obedience is the evidence of love of Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ.

But how can we decide that this sect is the true follower of Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ and acting upon Sunnah of Prophet ﷺ with true love and that sect is merely copying Prophet ﷺ. So let’s research and try to find the true standard of love. Hazrat Abu Daudرضی اللہ عنہ narrated that Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ said, “when one loves someone then he gets blind and deaf to the defects of beloved”.

This Hadees makes it clear that undeniable and true standard of love is that lover does not see and listen to the defects of the beloved. The true standard of love in the light of common sense is that it is impossible that lover sees any defects in the beloved and if a lover sees the defects in the beloved than love of the lover is nothing more than a lie. The loving eye cannot see defects in the beloved and Prophet Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ is defect-less.

Hazrat Hass’aab Bib Thabitرضی اللہ عنہ said about Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ that his eyes has not seen anyone beautiful like Prophet Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ because no mother ever gave birth to such a beautiful man; it seems Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ was created according to his own wishes without any defects.

It has been clarified that Prophet Hazrat Muhammad ﷺ is without any defects and one who finds any defect in Prophet ﷺ his claim of Love is false.

Hadees Shareef Visiting a sick

Hazrat Abu Moosaa (May Allaah be pleased with him) reported#

The Prophet of Allaah (ﷺ) said, "Visit the sick, feed the hungry, and (arrange for the) release of the captive.''

[Al-Bukhaari].

وعن أبي موسي الأشعري رضي الله عنه قال‏:‏ قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ، “ عودوا المريض، وأطعموا الجائع، وفكوا العاني‏"‏ ‏(‏‏(‏رواه البخاري‏)‏‏)‏‏.‏‎

Hadees Shareef Visiting a sick

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Excerpt- White and Black -by Hazrat Allaamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi

Hazrat Maulana Jalaal ud deen Rumi

Hazrat Maulana Jalaal ud deen Ruumi

(Rahmatul Laahi ‘Alaieh)
respectfully as Maulana ("our Master"), is a thirteenth-century Persian Soofie Saint Auliyaa Allaah, jurist, theologian, poet and one of the greatest spiritual masters of Islaam. He was known as Ruumi because he spent most of his life in the region known by Muslims as "Ruum," the Anatolian peninsula most of which had been conquered by the Seljuq Turks after centuries of rule by the Roman Empire.
He is acknowledged as the father of one of Islaam’s major Soofie orders, the Mevlevi order although its actual inception came about through his disciples. He was also often referred to by the Persian title, the ("great Master").....to be continued In  Shaa Allaah.

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Excerpt- White and Black -by Hazrat Allaamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi
4. The Wahaabis use most blasphemic language in respect of the Grandeur of Prophethood and the holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam).
And they consider themselves to be equal to the being of the holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam).  Also, consider very little value of the period of his preaching…….they think the holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) has no right on us now nor do we get any benefit or favour from his holy personality after his passing away.

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Excerpt-White and Black -Hazrat Allaamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi

Some of them give the status of adultery even to take a journey for the sake of paying a visit to the blessed tomb.”  (May Allaah forgive us)   (Pg 45)

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

3. “This group writes that having a vision of the blessed Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) and the visitation to his blessed tomb are unlawful innovations etc.  He also considers it unlawful and foolish to even travel in that direction with this intention.-

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

2. “Up till now the Najdis and his followers have this belief that the lives of Prophets (Alaiehimus-Salaam) were limited only to the times during which they were on this earth.  After that he and other believers are equal in death.” (Pg 45)

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Dear readers, my aim is not heart breaking or speaking lies. (May Almighty Allaah protect me from every sin) I speak the truth when I say that these hypocrites, ‘Sellers of barley in the name of wheat’ (Deobandi, Wahaabi and Tableeghi) whatever they say or do under the covering of the propagating of Religion, it is cause of shamefulness and distasteful.

It is amazing that they like to explain the wrong statements but they dont like to call a wrong as wrong.

Dear readers, every man of wisdom, thought, intellect and consciousness know that an abuse is an abuse.  You can do thousands of explanations; an abuse cannot be called a good supplication. We also say the same thing to the Deobandi, Wahaabi and Tableeghi people that until they don’t accept the blasphemic and infidel writings of their own elders as

blasphemic and infidel, according to the verdict of their own scholars and don’t deny to be the acceptors and believers of these writings the controversy will continue.

There is a famous anecdote that some people of a village went to a religious scholar and told him we have a well of water in the village, a dog has fallen into it and died. Tell us what is the way of purifying the water of this well? The religious scholar told them to draw a certain number of buckets of water from the well, the water would be purified. Those villagers went and drew the given amount of water but the bad smell continued in the water. They again went to the religious scholar and explained the situation. The religious scholar inquired from them if they had taken out the dead dog from the well or if it was still there?

They said, we have not taken out the dog. The religious scholar told them, unless you don’t take out the dog from the well no matter how much water you will draw out the foul smell will still continue. First take out the dog from the well, then take out the specified number of buckets of water and then see if the stink is removed or not!

Note Academy

These Wahhabi doctrines are unbelief, and lead to the Fire of Hell. Beware of them and the groups enamored with them.

Unfortunately for the ummah in our day, the statements of disbelief penned by the scholars of Deoband are still being promulgated on the World Wide Web, which means Deobandi authorities did not renounce their unbelief. They have also failed to condemn (as is wajib for them), and actually still keep on their syllabus and disseminate in all languages the works of deviated scholars the originator of most if not all of these heretical errors.

The way forward is to leave these insulting words and aberrant beliefs behind us by affirming the true creed of the Ahle Sunnat wa Jamaa’at. Real Deobandis and theircreed are worthy of disassociation....to be continued In Shaa Allaah!

Hadees-Shareef Forgiveness

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Now, if Gangohi Saahib is speaking the truth, than Husaien Ahmad Saahib Tandvi Madni is a liar and if Husaien Ahmad Madni is honest than Gangohi Saahib is dishonest.  Now, the decision depends on the followers of the two men.

Gangohi Saahib says that the beliefs of these (Najdis) are excellent.  How excellent are they?  See its explanation by the writing of the Head master of Deoband, Husaien Ahmad Saahib Madni who has listed in detail a series of examples of some of the belief of these Najdis in his book, “Ash Shahaubus Saaqib” (Printed Qutub Khana Ashrafiyahh, Rasheed Company, Deoband)
View them,
1. "It is the belief of Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab that all the people of the world and all Muslims are polytheists and nfidels. To kill them, to battle with them and to snatch their money from them is allowed and permissible yet it is mandatory.” (Ash Shahaubus Saaqib, Pg 43)

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Further consider this, Husaein Ahmad Saahib Madni President of Darul uloom Deoband says, "Gentlemen, Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi appeared from Najd in Arab in the early 13th century.

As he harbored evil thoughts and held wrong belief therefore, he waged war against the Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at and forced his evil thoughts on them. He considered it lawful seizing their properties as the spoils of war and killing them and also considered all these acts to bring blessings and earning rewards.  He gave severe pains particularly to the people of Haramain (Makkah and Madinah) and to the people of Hijaaz in general.

  He used most foul language against the grandeur of the respected pious people and the earlier generations.  Many people because of his severe violence had to flee the holy cities of Makkah and Madinah. Thousands of people were martyred in his hands and the hands of his troops. In short, he was a tyrant, rebel, blood thirsty and an evil person." (Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib, Pg 42)

White & Black Deoband-ism caught in its own trap

Continued excerpt- White & Black by Hazrat Allaamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi

Answer: In our view their verdict is the same which is given by the writer of Durr-e-Mukhtaar. (Ibne Abdul Wahaab and his followers), the Khawarij, are a famous group of people who waged war against the Imaam. It is the view, that they considered Imaam guilty of falsehood, meaning infidelity which justified waging war. For this reason they considered taking our lives and wealth as lawful and made our women their captives. He further says, the verdict which applies on them is of rebels.  He also held the opinion that they did not describe them as infidels because this was a matter of interpretation though a faulty one.And Allamah Shaami, in the marginal notes of the book said, "Like it happened in our times by the followers of Ibne Abdul Wahaab. They came from Najd and besieged Haramain Shareefain. They called themselves as Hambali creed but it was their belief that onlythey were Muslims. Whoever is against their belief he is a polytheist and due to this they justified the killing of the Ahle Sunnat and the scholars of the Ahle Sunnat, until Almighty Allaah deprived them of their superiority."

In "Fataawa Rasheediyah," it is stated that their (Najdis) belief are excellent, while in "Al-Muhannad," it is stated that only they (Najdis) are Muslims and whoever would be against their belief he is an polytheist.

And Ahle Sunnat are against their belief therefore infront of them the killing of Ahle Sunnat and the scholars of the Ahle-Sunnat as lawful.” So the result is infront of Gangohi Saahib to consider Ahle-Sunnat as polytheist and killing them is lawful and permitted. This is a good belief.  Therefore the Gangohi Saahib says, he and his followers are good.  While all other scholars of Deoband say they are “Kharijis and rebels.” It is clear that infront of Gangohi Saahib the Kharijis and rebels are good people.

Further consider this, Husaein Ahmad Saahib Madni President of Darul uloom Deoband says, "Gentlemen, Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab Najdi appeared from Najd in Arab in the early 13th century.

As he harbored evil thoughts and held wrong belief therefore, he waged war against the Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at and forced his evil thoughts on them. He considered it lawful seizing their properties as the spoils of war and killing them and also considered all these acts to bring blessings and earning rewards.  He gave severe pains particularly to the people of Haramain (Makkah and Madinah) and to the people of Hijaaz in general.  He used most foul language against the grandeur of the respected pious people and the earlier generations.  Many people because of his severe violence had to flee the holy cities of Makkah and Madinah. Thousands of people were martyred in his hands and the hands of his troops. In short, he was a tyrant, rebel, blood thirsty and an evil person." (Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib, Pg 42)